Version 1.0 · Released September 14, 2026

Meta-Analysis Studio

Prepare effect sizes, fit fixed- or random-effects models, examine heterogeneity, and generate publication-ready outputs in one browser-based workflow.

Calculations run entirely in your browser No account required Files are not uploaded to ERN Institute Privacy and analytics details

Studio workflow

Four steps from study results to finished outputs

Loading a file completes the preparation automatically. You run the pooled meta-analysis only after reviewing the prepared data.

  1. Step 1 Load study results Upload an ERN data file or use the built-in example.
  2. Step 2 Review automatically prepared data Effect sizes, validation checks, and unpooled forest plots are created as soon as the file loads.
  3. Step 3 Configure and run the meta-analysis Choose the effect-size metric, model, and settings, then run the pooled analysis.
  4. Step 4 Review result and export Interpret the pooled estimate and forest plot, then download publication-ready files.

Step 1

Load study results

Load the ERN template and the Studio will immediately calculate the effect sizes, validate every row, and generate separate unpooled forest plots for each effect-size metric. No separate run command is required for preparation. The pooled meta-analysis does not run until Step 3, and no data are sent to ERN.

Download example CSV
Created automatically when the file loads Calculated effect sizes · row-by-row validation · unpooled forest plots grouped by metric

Try published research data

Load an openly licensed dataset directly into the Studio. These public files come from our curated repository; your own files remain on your device.

Browse all datasets, sources and licenses →
Load your CSV or try the built-in example. The Studio will create the Step 2 effect sizes, validation report, and unpooled forest plots automatically.

Supported inputs

Common inputs

Independent meansMeans, SDs, and sample sizes → Hedges g
Independent tStudent t and group sizes → Hedges g
Independent FTwo-group F(1, df2), group sizes, and direction → Hedges g
CorrelationPearson r and n → Fisher z
Binary outcomeEvents and totals → log odds ratio
Generic inverse-varianceEffect estimate plus sampling variance or standard error → analysis-ready effect
Calculation definitions and current limits

Independent means: pooled-standard-deviation Cohen d, corrected to Hedges g. The reported variance includes the small-sample correction.

Independent t: converts a Student independent-groups t statistic to Cohen d, then applies the Hedges correction. Welch, paired, repeated-measures, adjusted-model, and mixed-model t statistics are not supported by this pathway.

Independent F: supports only a simple two-group between-subjects test with numerator df = 1 and denominator df = n1 + n2 − 2. Because F has no sign, f_direction is required. Omnibus, ANCOVA, repeated-measures, multilevel, and mixed-model F statistics must not be entered here.

Correlations: reports Fisher z for analysis and Pearson r as the natural-scale value.

Binary outcomes: reports the log odds ratio for analysis and the odds ratio on its natural scale. A 0.5 continuity correction is disclosed when an otherwise informative 2×2 table contains a zero cell. Studies with no events in either group, or all events in both groups, are retained in the audit trail but excluded from odds-ratio pooling because they contain no comparative information.

Generic inverse-variance: accepts an already calculated effect size on a named analysis scale plus either its sampling variance or standard error. This is the appropriate route when a study design has already been handled with a valid external method and should not be forced into one of the raw-data conversion pathways.

Current limit: raw-data conversion does not support paired, repeated-measures, cluster-randomized, multilevel, adjusted-model, omnibus-F, survival, or non-independent effect structures. If a valid effect estimate and variance have already been calculated for one of these designs, use generic inverse-variance input. Non-independent effects still require a dependency-aware model and should not be pooled as independent.

Reproducible methods

Methods, validation and citation

Review the statistical conventions, supported designs, reproducibility tests and version information before using the results in a manuscript.